ABSTRACT
This qualitative study aimed to understand the lived experiences of supervisors in the implementation of the School of Tomorrow as a basis for program enhancement. The research method utilized in the study was qualitative, using in-depth interviews, and the design was phenomenology with thematic analysis. The challenges encountered by supervisors in the implementation of the School of Tomorrow curriculum were found to be managing students' output and tests, managing students with special needs, and managing transferees from non-SOT schools. Programs were recommended to enhance the system by providing assistance and support mechanisms, continuous training and mentorship programs, developing structured programs for transferees and special needs students, creating ongoing professional development, establishing structured communication channels and engagement programs, and ensuring continuous professional training for supervisors.
Keywords: Supervisors’ experiences, School of Tomorrow, Implementation, Program Enhancement
INTRODUCTION
Over the years, it was known to us that the evolution of curriculum has been demanding due to the pressure of catering diverse learning needs with different innovative methods of teaching towards 21st century learners. According to an article of Association of American Colleges and Universities by Persen and O’Neill (2025), it is important to establish innovative outcomes of curriculum development and integration of technology in education because of the substantial changes that is happening in our society such as technological developments and the shifting focus of workforce from industrial to knowledge-based skills.
One of the curriculums that exists in the Philippines is the School of Tomorrow (SOT), also known as Accelerated Christian Education (A.C.E.) program. The curriculum was recognized by the Department of Education (DepEd) to accommodate learners aged four and five to develop basic skills that prepare them to learn to read; The program has an intensive pre-elementary reading program that can be completed within 12-15 weeks depending on the child’s capability to learn; Also, the curriculum offers an individualized elementary program that can be completed within six to eight years that can lead into succeeding program in high school which can be usually accomplished within three to four years. It was stated by the executive director of the SOT Philippines that the curriculum has been implementing the k-12 program for the past 40 years, long before the DepEd adopted it (Panaligan & Maming, 2021).
Learning center supervisors, instead of traditional teachers, serve as facilitators that guides the learners in setting goals for the day, tracking progress, and ensuring that the mastery of each “learning modules” called PACEs (Packets of Accelerated Christian Education) takes place before proceeding to the next one. The curriculum emphasizes on fostering independent learning, critical thinking, and self-discipline with integration of Biblical Principles.
Despite having a fascinating teaching-learning process, the implementation of School of Tomorrow curriculum contains present challenges. Learning center supervisors must give effective instructional and motivational strategies as well as facilitating the individual learning difficulties, while following the curriculum procedures.
The School of Tomorrow having the Accelerated Christian Education (A.C.E.) here in the Philippines promises that they can give the most advanced twenty-first-century educational system available, but the experiences and grievances of S.O.T. graduates stated otherwise. In some S.O.T. schools the curriculum is offered in Pre-School to Junior High School only, difficulty in transitioning from S.O.T. school to conventional schools offering Senior High School Program and conventional schools must be adopted and integrated to the S.O.T. Junior High School (Panaligan & Maming, 2021).
This study aimed to take a glance on the experiences of learning center supervisors in implementing the School of Tomorrow. These experiences highlighted insights on how to improve practices as well as to employ strategies in implementing the curriculum. It aimed to be a venue for hopeful “shared understanding” among fellow colleagues or facilitators which can be an instrument for continuous improvement on the implementation of SOT system, ensuring that it is effective and attainable in the current educational setting.
see PDF attachment for more information