ABSTRACT
This study determined the significant relationship on the school Heads Decision-making practices and administrative support in relation to School-based management (SBM) Implementation. A proposed instructional supervisory plan was formulated based on the result of the study. This study employed a quantitative correlational research design to determine the relationship between school heads’ decision-making skills, administrative support, and the effectiveness of School-Based Management (SBM) implementation. The correlational design was chosen because it allowed the researcher to examine the extent to which variations in decision-making practices and administrative support predicted the success of SBM implementation across multiple schools. This design also facilitated the identification of patterns, strengths, and weaknesses in school leadership practices that influenced program outcomes without manipulating variables, ensuring that the natural context of school operations was preserved.
The Test of Relationship, showing the correlation between School Heads’ Decision-Making Practices, Leadership and Management Practices, and Administrative Support Practices. The table examines how the decision-making behaviors of school heads relate to their overall leadership and management practices and how these, in turn, influence the administrative support provided within schools. The analysis highlights the interconnectedness of school leadership practices and their combined effect on organizational and instructional outcomes. The results revealed a strong positive relationship between School Heads’ Decision-Making Practices and Leadership & Management Practices, suggesting that principals who demonstrated effective analytical, participatory, strategic, ethical, and adaptive decision-making consistently exhibited strong governance, curriculum planning, accountability, and resource management behaviors. Likewise, Leadership & Management Practices showed a strong positive relationship with Administrative Support Practices, implying that school heads who managed and led effectively also provided substantial support to teachers, including resource provision, professional development, communication, motivation, recognition, and monitoring. Both relationships were statistically significant, confirming that effective decision-making and leadership behaviors were closely associated with a supportive and well-managed school environment. These results imply that improvements in decision-making skills and leadership and management practices directly enhanced the administrative support provided to teachers, fostering a positive school climate, higher teacher engagement, and improved instructional performance. The overall findings demonstrate strong positive associations, indicating that when school heads made informed, strategic, and ethical decisions and managed school operations effectively, they strengthened the entire educational system, emphasizing the pivotal role of school leaders in creating functional and supportive school environments.
Keywords: Decision-making Practices, School Head, Administrative Support, SBM
INTRODUCTION
Decision-making skills and administrative support of school heads play a crucial role in the successful implementation of School-Based Management (SBM). Effective school leaders engage in participative decision-making, consult teachers and stakeholders, and establish clear procedures for resource allocation, curriculum planning, and program implementation. Administrative support, including timely provision of learning materials, personnel management, and policy guidance, ensures that teachers can focus on instruction and learners benefit from a well-organized learning environment. When school heads combine strategic decision-making with proactive support, they foster a culture of collaboration, accountability, and shared responsibility, which is essential for SBM to achieve its goals of improving school autonomy, teacher effectiveness, and student outcomes.
Camarena and Velasco (2025) examined the influence of school heads’ decision-making and administrative support on the implementation of School-Based Management in public secondary schools in the Philippines. Using a mixed-methods approach, their study found that principals who practiced inclusive decision-making and provided consistent administrative support significantly enhanced teacher participation, program adherence, and student performance. Conversely, schools with limited administrative backing and centralized decision-making faced challenges in fully implementing SBM initiatives, demonstrating that effective leadership practices are critical to operationalizing school autonomy and achieving intended educational outcomes.
School leadership plays a pivotal role in shaping school performance and the overall learning environment. Observations and experiences in educational settings indicate that the role of school heads extends far beyond mere supervision; they are central to establishing the school culture, setting priorities, and ensuring effective management. Their decision-making practices and the administrative support they provide significantly influence how School-Based Management (SBM) is implemented, affecting teacher performance, student outcomes, and the efficiency of school programs. By exploring these aspects, the study seeks to generate empirical evidence on how leadership behaviors and support mechanisms impact the operationalization of SBM in schools.
Effective leadership is critical for schools to achieve the goals of SBM, which emphasizes decentralization, accountability, and stakeholder engagement. While policies promote shared governance and school autonomy, the success of SBM often depends on the school head’s ability to make informed decisions and provide administrative support that ensures teachers and staff can execute programs effectively. Studies show that inconsistent leadership and lack of coherent administrative backing hinder the adoption of SBM principles, leading to variable outcomes across schools. Examining leadership competencies within this context can inform strategies to strengthen policy implementation and instructional management at the school level.
Despite the clear importance of leadership in SBM, conducting research in this area presents several challenges. Both decision-making practices and administrative support are broad, multifaceted constructs that require precise operationalization to ensure consistency in measurement. Additionally, obtaining reliable data is challenging because school heads may be reluctant to disclose detailed information about their leadership practices due to fear of judgment or administrative consequences. Variability across school contexts, including differences in size, resources, and community engagement, further complicates the isolation of leadership variables as predictors of SBM effectiveness. Finally, gaining access to multiple schools and securing the necessary permissions demands careful planning and coordination with educational authorities.
This study is necessary because these challenges highlight gaps in understanding how school leadership concretely affects SBM implementation. By investigating the decision-making practices and administrative support of school heads, the research aims to identify specific behaviors and systems that facilitate effective school governance. The findings are expected to provide actionable insights for improving leadership training, policy support, and school management practices. Ultimately, this study seeks to enhance the capacity of school leaders to implement SBM successfully, thereby improving teacher performance, student outcomes, and overall school effectiveness—addressing a critical need in both research and practice.
This study determined the significant relationship on the school Heads Decision-making practices and administrative support in relation to School-based management (SBM) Implementation. A proposed instructional supervisory plan was formulated based on the result of the study.
see PDF attachment for more information