ABSTRACT
This study determines the relationship between the monitoring and evaluation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program implementation and the performance of learners. Baybay II Central School, Baybay II District, Baybay City Division is the locale of the study with nineteen (19) teachers, one school head and 80 ARAL learners were involved. To measure the variables of the study, the researcher utilizes the two (2) different survey questionnaire to measure the extent of monitoring and evaluation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program implementation. Part 1 and 2 of the survey is used to measure the extent of monitoring and evaluation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program implementation and this survey questionnaire is a researcher-developed based on the provisions of Republic Act No. 12028 (ARAL Program Act), its Implementing Rules and Regulations, DepEd guidelines on ARAL implementation, and established program monitoring and evaluation frameworks such as Stufflebeam's CIPP Model. Finally, to measure the learners’ performance in reading, the researcher formulated reading tests that was administered to the learners. Based on the result of the study, it was revealed that there is a significant relationship between the extent of monitoring and evaluation of the ARAL Program implementation and learners' performance in reading. The findings imply that systematic monitoring and evaluation are important components of effective learning recovery implementation.
Keywords: Monitoring, Evaluation, Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program, Implementation, Performance, Learners
INTRODUCTION
The educational landscape has undergone significant changes in recent years due to the disruptions brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic. Prolonged school closures and alternative learning modalities resulted in substantial learning losses among learners, particularly in foundational skills such as reading, mathematics, and science. Studies conducted after the pandemic revealed that many learners experienced declines in academic achievement, and recovery efforts have remained uneven across different educational settings. Research indicates that learning losses continue to affect learners' academic performance several years after the pandemic, emphasizing the need for targeted intervention programs and systematic recovery initiatives.
In response to these challenges, the Philippine government enacted the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program through Republic Act No. 12028. The ARAL Program aims to provide structured learning interventions for learners who are struggling to meet the required competencies, particularly in reading, mathematics, and science. The program seeks to address learning gaps, improve mastery of essential learning competencies, and support learners in recovering from educational setbacks. The law specifically emphasizes the importance of assessment, intervention, tutorial support, and continuous monitoring of learner progress to ensure the effectiveness of the program.
The success of educational intervention programs largely depends on effective monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. Monitoring enables school administrators and program implementers to track the progress of activities, ensure compliance with program guidelines, identify implementation challenges, and provide timely support. Evaluation, on the other hand, determines whether program objectives are achieved and whether the interventions contribute to improvements in learner outcomes. Educational research consistently highlights that systematic monitoring and evaluation play a critical role in enhancing program effectiveness and ensuring accountability in educational reforms.
As the ARAL Program continues to be implemented across schools, there is a growing need to examine how monitoring and evaluation practices influence its effectiveness in improving learner performance. While the program was designed to address learning loss and strengthen academic achievement, limited empirical studies have examined the relationship between monitoring and evaluation practices and learners' academic outcomes within the ARAL framework. Understanding this relationship can provide valuable insights for school leaders, teachers, and policymakers in strengthening program implementation and maximizing learner achievement.
The implementation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program represents one of the Philippine government's major responses to the educational challenges brought about by learning loss and declining academic achievement among learners. Republic Act No. 12028 was enacted to provide systematic interventions that help learners attain essential competencies in reading, mathematics, and science while addressing the learning gaps that emerged during and after the pandemic.
Although the ARAL Program provides structured learning interventions, the achievement of its intended outcomes depends largely on the quality of its implementation. Effective implementation requires continuous monitoring to ensure that planned activities are carried out properly and evaluation to determine whether the program successfully improves learner performance. Without adequate monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, schools may encounter challenges in identifying implementation gaps, assessing learner progress, and making timely adjustments to intervention strategies.
Furthermore, recent educational studies have emphasized that learning recovery initiatives must be accompanied by strong accountability systems and evidence-based assessment practices to ensure that interventions produce meaningful improvements in learner achievement. While the ARAL Program has been institutionalized as a national intervention program, there remains a need to examine how monitoring and evaluation practices contribute to its effectiveness at the school level. There is limited local evidence regarding whether existing monitoring and evaluation procedures adequately support the successful implementation of the program and lead to improved learner performance.
This study is therefore necessary to assess the extent of monitoring and evaluation practices employed in the implementation of the ARAL Program and determine their relationship with learners' academic performance. The findings provided school heads, teachers, and education policymakers with empirical evidence that can guide decision-making, strengthen program implementation, improve intervention strategies, and ensure that the objectives of the ARAL Program are effectively achieved.
This study determined the relationship between the monitoring and evaluation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program implementation and the performance of learners in Baybay II Central School, Baybay City District II, Baybay City Division. The findings of the study were basis for the proposed enhancement plan.
see PDF attachment for more information